Video of gushing farmed salmon blood reignites concerns about aquaculture

salmon blood spills into ocean

Screenshot of Tavish Campbell's video

salmon blood spills into ocean

Screenshot of Tavish Campbell's video

The graphic footage is the latest flashpoint in an ongoing debate about the environmental safety of farmed seafood.

In August, we wrote about the Great Solar Eclipse Salmon Escape of 2017, when thousands of farmed Atlantic salmon escaped their pens for the free waters of the Pacific ocean, seemingly driven mad by the moon. Since then, anti-salmon farming sentiment has been heating up along the West Coast in United States and Canada. Following the big escape, Washington governor Jay Inslee declared a moratorium on new net-pen farming operations in the state. State senator Kevin Ranker has sponsored a bill that would gradually phase out the process, ending it entirely after 2025.

The industry is relatively new, and direct impacts can be difficult to prove.
The farmed salmon industry, which makes up 70 percent of the global salmon market, has long been divisive. Because farming salmon requires fewer natural resources than raising, say, cattle—it releases far less carbon and requires no land—some environmental groups have embraced it as a relatively sustainable source of protein. But fishermen and marine biologists have raised concerns that salmon farms can spread sea lice and communicable disease to nearby wild populations. And this summer’s escape prompted concerns that freed farmed salmon would outcompete their free-floating counterparts.

The debate reached a fever pitch last week when photographer Tavish Campbell released footage of a waste pipe spewing a bright cloud of salmon blood into the ocean off the coast of British Columbia’s Vancouver Island. The “sanitized effluent” was flowing from Brown’s Bay Packing Company, a processing plant that processes over 32 million pounds of fish per year, the BBC reports. The story blew up: Buzzfeed, Quartz, the BBC, the Seattle Times, and even the Weather Network covered the graphic video.

The plant hadn’t broken any laws by releasing the waste, and representatives insisted the blood been treated to kill germs that may be harmful to wild salmon. Still, tests for common pathogens including piscine reovirus came back positive, according to BBC. The virus, which can kill up to 20 percent of infected fish in farmed salmon populations, may be contagious in wild populations as well. That’s concerning because the video also showed wild fish swimming close to the waste pipe, which is located along their normal migratory routes.

The blood-spewing pipe is a powerful visual. But there’s not a whole lot of data linking salmon pens to the spread of disease in wild populations—the industry is relatively new, and direct impacts can be difficult to prove.

Tensions continue to be exacerbated by the close proximity of wild populations and fish-farming pens
“Direct evidence is a scientific term. So to get direct evidence that sea lice from fish farms are killing wild salmon, I would have to watch a single louse hatch on a farmed salmon and travel for three days and then get on a wild fish,” independent biologist Alexandra Morton tells Seafood News. “That’s physically impossible, when you have a million fish going around on a farm and the sea lice are only a few millimetres long.” After she authored a study in 2011 that suggested a virus had caused a 2009 sockeye salmon collapse, then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s administration prevented her from talking to reporters.

Since that 2009 scare, which prompted a federal inquiry, there’s been a freeze on the construction of new salmon farms in British Columbia. That freeze is scheduled to expire in 2020.

For its part, the salmon-farming industry has made recent efforts to lessen its environmental impact, National Geographic reports. In 2013, 15 of the largest salmon companies joined the Global Salmon Initiative, a move that signaled they would limit antibiotic use and meet sustainability guidelines established by independent Aquaculture Stewardship Council.

But for some—especially those who depend on wild salmon for food and income—it’s not enough. In British Columbia, members of Canada’s First Nations and other concerned citizens have engaged in a months-long occupation of salmon farms owned by Norway-based Marine Harvest. (See Monday’s feature in Seafood News for a lengthy backgrounder on the Marine Harvest occupation, and why First Nations views the industry as a threat.) Last month, British Columbia’s Minister of Agriculture sent a letter to Marine Harvest asserting that the company should strive toward maintaining a healthy relationship with First Nations; otherwise, its fish-farming licenses may not be renewed, the Seattle Times reports.

It costs about 12 times as much to raise salmon indoors

But tensions continue to be exacerbated by the close proximity of wild populations and fish-farming pens. For now, the Namgis First Nation have advocated moving aquaculture operations to indoor tanks. According to aquaculture company Fish Information and Services, it costs about 12 times as much to raise salmon indoors, but the tanks pose no threat to wild populations. It might just be worth it.

H. Claire Brown is a senior staff writer for The Counter. Her work has also appeared in The Atlantic, The Guardian, and The Intercept and has won awards from the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing, the New York Press Club, the Newswomen's Club of New York, and others. A North Carolina native, she now lives in Brooklyn.