| A win-win? Really? Last night, around 9:30, a New York Times news alert flashed on our phones. The Trump administration had finally finalized its rule to roll back the Waters of the United States rule, the end point in a plan that has been inching along since the president’s first day in office. But what really caught our eye was less about the news itself and more about the Times‘s characterization of this particular scuffle: It called the change a “victory for farmers,” based on the quote of just one Farm Bureau lobbyist. To which, editor Kate Cox texted late last night: “Why would the Times characterize this move with so little nuance?” |
Every year, California dairy farms emit hundreds of thousands of tons of the potent greenhouse…
Highway 7 runs north-south through western Washington, carving its way through a landscape sparsely dotted…
One of the greatest pleasures I had as a child growing up in the Chicago…
Undocumented immigrants experience food insecurity at much higher rates than other populations, yet they are…
Writer Charlotte Druckman and editor Rebecca Flint Marx are both Jewish journalists living in New…
Last fall, first-year law student Karissa Kang arrived at Yale University and quickly set out…