Categories: Politics

USDA announces teleworking option for ERS and NIFA researchers through 2019

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) will allow researchers at the Economic Research Service (ERS) and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) to request to work remotely from D.C. through the end of the year, the employees’ union announced on Friday. For those approved for teleworking, this move will provide flexibility around USDA’s controversial plans to relocate both agencies to Kansas City by September 30. Those who previously rejected relocation now have until the end of September to reconsider their choice.

“The agencies have already hemorrhaged significant talent and expertise.”
“This is certainly a positive development that could encourage more employees to relocate, but it does not make up for all the anxiety and anguish that employees have been going through since this relocation was first announced,” said J. David Cox Sr., president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), in the press release. AFGE represents over 400 employees in ERS and NIFA cumulatively, though exact numbers are hard to estimate due to fluctuations in attrition and hiring.

According to a USDA spokesperson, a decision about teleworking requests “will be considered on an individual, case by case basis.”

Nearly one year ago, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced plans to move ERS and NIFA to the Midwest, describing the decision as a cost-saving measure. However, affected employees saw the relocation as an effort to quash their research, which has challenged many of the current presidential administration’s talking points on climate change, food stamps, and the trade war.

In response, ERS and NIFA employees voted to unionize, in hopes of using collective bargaining power to push back against upper management’s changesthough USDA is still ploughing forward with the relocation. (It should be mentioned, the agency made this decision despite low employee morale, the ire of elected officials, and a damning internal watchdog report finding that USDA may have broken the law with the move.)

Related: Why is Trump slashing the USDA’s independent research arm? Look at its findings.

Teleworking possibility is one of a handful of concessions to which the department agreed in negotiations with the employees’ unions. Others include details about temporary housing, nursing rooms for breastfeeding employees, and bonuses equivalent to one month’s salary for employees who agree to relocate. According to the agreements, which can be found here (ERS) and here (NIFA), the bonuses are limited to jobs that are considered “difficult to fill,” based on criteria established by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). However, since most ERS and NIFA employees are considered scientific researchers under OPM guidelines, most will likely qualify, AFGE organizer Peter Winch tells The New Food Economy. 

Significantly, the agreement also gives ERS and NIFA employees who previously rejected moving to Kansas City a chance to change their minds. This provision is arguably an attempt to retain researchers, who have overwhelmingly signaled their opposition to leaving the Beltway.

“The agencies have already hemorrhaged significant talent and expertise,” a Ariela Zycherman, a current NIFA employee and union steward, told The New Food Economy. “In order to keep doing the important work our agencies do, we hope this agreement will help some employees make the difficult decision to transition and ease the transition for those who have already agreed to do so.”

Others, however, were less optimistic, and believed that while some researchers may agree to relocate in exchange for a teleworking option, they may only do so with the intention of buying more time to consider other options in D.C.

“I don’t know if it’s a game changer for anybody,” said an ERS researcher who has found another job and expects to resign shortly. “The one thing it will probably do is it’ll allow people longer, more time to look for jobs.”

Sam Bloch contributed reporting to this story.

Jessica Fu
Share
Published by
Jessica Fu
Tags: ERSNIFAUSDA

Recent Posts

Report: Big Mac cartons, Whopper wrappers, and other fast food packaging found to contain PFAS “forever chemicals”

It’s been one year since an investigation from The Counter revealed that molded fiber bowls—the “compostable,” seemingly earth-friendly containers popular…

15 hours ago

If there’s so much food, why are millions still hungry?

Since the days of Norman Borlaug, producers of all kinds, from industrial grain farmers to cell-cultured meat entrepreneurs, have claimed…

2 days ago

Pandemic accelerates fast-food companies’ plans for digital growth

The Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated fast food giants’ efforts to go digital, Bloomberg Opinion reports. Chipotle reported a massive uptick…

2 days ago

Distilleries that raced to produce hand sanitizer now face unforeseen costs

In March, distilleries raced to produce hand sanitizer as larger personal-care brands like Purell fell out of step with demand.…

2 days ago

Can restaurants finally move away from myopic, chef-centered narratives?

The restaurant industry and the media industry that covers are undergoing a paradigm shift in the way they tell stories…

2 days ago

Flimsy plastic knives, a single microwave, and empty popcorn bags: How 50 inmates inside a Michigan prison prepared a feast to celebrate the life of George Floyd

As global protests broke out in response to the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer, Michael Thompson…

2 days ago