Conventional wisdom says rye varieties don’t affect whiskey flavor. One producer spent three years proving they do.

But Swanson had grown and distilled Hazlet for several years before he considered the possibility that other varietals might provide flavors distinct from those he was getting from Hazlet. It was a 2014 call from a Maine farmer who had been growing rye for some local distillers that got Swanson thinking about other varietals. This rye producer said that distillers had complained about the pronounced pepper spice they were getting from rye categorized as VNS (“variety not stated”) by grain merchants. He had heard about the vanilla notes Swanson was getting from his Hazlet rye and had set out to get some for himself. However, the producer had not been able to find the seed anywhere east of Saskatchewan, so he asked if Swanson would sell him some. Swanson did, and thus started his deeper dive into the relationship between rye varietals and flavor—with the help of researchers from the University of Minnesota Crookston.

The vast majority of commodity rye grain is sold as VNS rye. The same is largely true of the rye seed farmers buy, though there is a bit more specificity of variety on the seed side. There are many factors behind the prevalence of VNS rye, but an important one is that many farmers grow rye only as a cover crop. But another significant reason is that rye is a cross-pollinator that can shift genetic—and thus varietal—characteristics in just a generation or two, which makes it difficult to maintain one variety’s purity over time. 

Unlike most rye whiskey producers, Swanson grows all the grain he distills, and he had come to believe that the variety of rye he had chosen was more important than conventional wisdom recognized. Swanson wasn’t the only one: A few other distillers in the U.S. were also making whiskey from specific rye varietals, so he set out to test the proposition that variety affects flavor. 

In 2015 Swanson asked Jochum Wiersma, a small grains specialist at the University of Minnesota Crookston, if there was any scientific research into how variety influences flavor, particularly in rye whiskey production. The answer, a literature review suggested, was no. So together, they applied for and won a crop research grant from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture to start the process of finding out. Despite what Swanson had already gleaned from distilling different varieties of rye, he knew an outcome showing that variety does not influence flavor would be a valid scientific result, even a welcome one.

“That would be good news for farmers,” Swanson said, “because then they could grow whatever rye grows best for them, and good for distillers, because the flavor of the ultimate spirit would then be mostly about their skill and not the exact character of their ingredients.” 

Researchers at the University of Minnesota Crookston examined the flavor profiles of whiskeys produced from 15 different winter rye varietals. In the study, 190 participants (a mix of industry experts and laypeople) smelled and tasted the unaged distillates—or “white whiskey”—and provided descriptive feedback for each of them. The results, portrayed as flavor wheels with larger sections representing greater frequency of that descriptor, demonstrated significant differences between varieties, with tasters sharing common flavor notes for each variety. Some, like Arostook, Brasetto, Oklon, and Bono, offered pronounced floral notes, while others, like Rymin, Spooner, Dylan, and Wheeler, leaned more sweet- and fruit-forward in their profiles. The frequency of grainy and spicy notes also varied noticeably across varieties. And some varieties clearly yielded more “off” notes—sulphur, solvent, chemical—than others.

Winter rye varietals of whiskey flavor wheels produced by researchers at the University of Minnesota Crookston

Five varieties received fewer responses, so their flavor wheels feature less detail:

Wiersma pointed out several shortcomings of the study, like the fact that it featured neither replicated grow-outs (growing particular varietals more than once) nor replicated batches (making whiskey batches with each varietal more than once). Instead, over the three years of the study, each year featured a distinct set of five or six varietals grown in one-acre test plots, meaning some varietals were grown in different seasons. And with only one-acre plots for each varietal, some of which yielded much less than others, there wasn’t enough of some varieties to make more than one batch of whiskey. But Wiersma added, “To me, the study is really a first foray into the question: Does variety matter?” 

Despite the study’s limitations, Wiersma said the results point clearly in one direction: The flavor differences between types of rye in the study are so vast that they are most likely varietal rather than seasonal. Since Swanson grew all of the plots on his own land, the differences could not be attributed to location. Production techniques were also consistent across varieties, as Swanson used the same enzymes and mashing process for each, and ran them all through the same single-pass distillation process. 

Jeremy Wilson, a farmer in Jamestown, North Dakota, whose approach centers on no-till techniques, grows rye both as a cover crop and for harvest, but his main focus is on what rye does for his soil. “One of my biggest uses of rye is before soybeans, because I can plant soybeans right into rye, and they don’t mind the rye being there at all,” he said. “Rye has an allelopathic effect in its roots where it doesn’t allow other weeds or plants to grow. And we use that to our advantage: We’ll plant a good stand of rye, then we have less dependence on herbicides for some of our other crops. So rye’s kind of my buddy.”

Another challenge is that many of the open-pollinating varieties, especially those sought after as “heritage grains,” not only yield less than the hybrids, but many also add layers of difficulty by requiring particular spraying schedules or special harvesting techniques. Laura Fields, CEO of the Delaware Valley Fields Foundation and the driving force behind the Seed Spark Project, which aims to restore long-lost heritage grains, has been working to bring the varietal Rosen rye back to Pennsylvania (Michter’s, back when it was a Pennsylvania distillery, touted the ingredient for a number of years on its labels). One farmer she worked with, Wesley Kline, did not find growing Rosen too challenging once Fields laid out the steps he should follow and their timing. But some of the steps were new to him, like applying a growth inhibitor early on to help keep the notoriously tall Rosen rye plants (which normally reach six feet in height) from falling over. And harvesting such a tall plant caused some issues: “It’s a lot slower harvesting,” Klein said, “because of the length of the straw. And it was also laying down, so it took longer.” Klein had a good experience growing Rosen and got a great yield and a high price for his crop, but is ambivalent about growing more. “I’m not sure yet,” he said. “We want to grow it a second time [on the same small plot they used last year] to see.”

There are also questions about how best to establish sustainable markets for varietal ryes. Wiersma, for example, notes that unless a big producer decides to use varietals, the demand for such ryes faces one significant barrier: “You don’t need a lot to make a hell of a lot of whiskey. Two quarters, or 320 acres, for a farmer isn’t that much. But for Mike, it’s enough to last him a decade. We can’t drink our way out of that problem.”

But varietal advocates like Fields are working to address this problem of scale directly. Fields and the Seed Spark Project are connecting farmers to a growing stable of distillers to produce Rosen directly for them. The goal is a farming cooperative that provides Rosen rye in such a way that no particular bad crop leaves distillers without grain. But scaling up too quickly can undercut the premium farmers can currently get for Rosen. “I want to make sure that we’re satisfying all of the needs without overproducing, and having money lost, because this is a very expensive grain to grow right now,” Fields said. “So it’s a balancing act.”