Categories: Environment

On Maryland’s Delmarva Peninsula, an emerging trend of anti-CAFO zoning laws

Commissioners in Worcester County, Maryland, on Tuesday unanimously voted to make things tougher on one of its largest employers: the local chicken industry. By passing County Bill 17-3, which creates a separate, more stringent zoning classification for large poultry farms, the county sent the message that even if it likes the money the farms bring to the area, it’s fed up with the way they pollute.

A standard chicken house has over 40,000 square feet of floor space and will hold tens of thousands of birds. The new law stipulates that only eight of those chicken houses can be built on any parcel of land. In addition, large operations—defined as farms with more than five houses on one property—must set all structures at least 200 feet back from all property lines, and build a three-rowed buffer of trees and vegetation along the boundary.

Until now, Worcester residents unhappy about the factory farms next door didn’t have much recourse. In order to start a new Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO), the state’s Department of the Environment requires operators only to submit a plan that includes the number of animals, and a plan for addressing soil erosion, water quality, and disposal of waste. There’s no limit per se on how close CAFOs can be to a residence, or how badly they can smell. The courts aren’t much help, since the state’s right-to-farm rule makes it hard for locals to bring nuisance suits. But county zoning has turned out to be an effective tool.

Related Post

Worcester is following the lead of two neighboring counties on the Delmarva Peninsula, the easternmost part of Maryland, which juts like a talon into the Atlantic. In August, Somerset County passed a similar law, and was followed closely by Wicomico County. The Delmarva region, which also includes much of Delaware, is one of the country’s most prolific producers of meat chickens. In 2014, farms there produced 596 million broilers, or chickens raised for meat—almost 7 percent of the country’s total production on just a tiny fraction of its land mass.

The new rule won’t change much for existing operations with more than eight barns. They’ll have to build the buffers, and they won’t be able to add any new facilities without subdividing property, but their existing operations will otherwise be grandfathered in. Still, it may be enough to slow the growth of CAFOs in the state.

Joe Fassler
Share
Published by
Joe Fassler
Tags: CAFOpoultry

Recent Posts

Grist acquires The Counter and launches food and agriculture vertical

Grist, an award-winning, nonprofit media organization dedicated to highlighting climate solutions and uncovering environmental injustices,…

6 months ago

Is California giving its methane digesters too much credit?

Every year, California dairy farms emit hundreds of thousands of tons of the potent greenhouse…

3 years ago

Your car is killing coho salmon

Highway 7 runs north-south through western Washington, carving its way through a landscape sparsely dotted…

3 years ago

The pandemic has transformed America’s dining landscape into an oligopoly dominated by chains 

One of the greatest pleasures I had as a child growing up in the Chicago…

3 years ago

California is moving toward food assistance for all populations—including undocumented immigrants

Undocumented immigrants experience food insecurity at much higher rates than other populations, yet they are…

3 years ago

Babka, borscht … and pumpkin spice? Two writers talk about Jewish identity through contemporary cookbooks.

Writer Charlotte Druckman and editor Rebecca Flint Marx are both Jewish journalists living in New…

3 years ago