Categories: Culture

Defining milk, again

Mulling ‘milk.’ Last month, we reported on a letter that the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) sent to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), co-signed by 32 members of Congress, in which they requested that the agency use its regulatory power to crack down on plant-based products calling themselves “milk.” The m-word, the signees argued, should retain its strict legal definition: “the lacteal secretion, practically free from colostrum, of one or more healthy cows.” Period.

Do consumers think words like “milk,” “yogurt,” and “cheese” mean “from a cow”?

This shouldn’t be surprising: perhaps more than anything, it’s a sign that an entrenched, mature industry is worried about competition from newfangled upstarts. As staff writer Claire Brown reported, the dairy industry and its allies pulled a similar move in the 1880s, when margarine first hit the scene. Said one cheesehead senator from Wisconsin: “I decline to accept as a substitute caul fat, matured under the chill of death.”

Related Post

A recent article from Dairy Navigator’s Elaine Watson takes the question further: do consumers think words like “milk,” “yogurt,” and “cheese” mean “from a cow”? Or will they understand when those terms are used to characterize the taste and texture of plant-based products? Watson’s exploration raises some good points. The official standard of identity defines “milk” as cow milk, and yet NMPF is just fine with the terms “sheep milk” and “goat milk.” Is it really such a stretch, then, to say “soy milk”? (A helpful, universally accepted analogue: no one really thinks peanut butter contains any, well, butter.) If they can’t avail themselves of widely-recognizable terms, what should plant-based companies call their products? Is “cultured nut product” really a more helpful, clarifying term than “almond cheese”?

Watson sees evidence that FDA is willing to let the issue slide—last year, after initially signaling otherwise, the agency let eggless vegan spread “Just Mayo” keep its name. But a new labeling fight may soon be upon us. What happens when biological milks, cheeses, and meats no longer come from an actual animal? That brave new world is rapidly arriving, thanks to lab-grown startups like Perfect Day and Memphis Meats. Can you call it “milk” when there was never a cow?

Joe Fassler
Share
Published by
Joe Fassler
Tags: dairyFDAmilk

Recent Posts

Grist acquires The Counter and launches food and agriculture vertical

Grist, an award-winning, nonprofit media organization dedicated to highlighting climate solutions and uncovering environmental injustices,…

7 months ago

Is California giving its methane digesters too much credit?

Every year, California dairy farms emit hundreds of thousands of tons of the potent greenhouse…

3 years ago

Your car is killing coho salmon

Highway 7 runs north-south through western Washington, carving its way through a landscape sparsely dotted…

3 years ago

The pandemic has transformed America’s dining landscape into an oligopoly dominated by chains 

One of the greatest pleasures I had as a child growing up in the Chicago…

3 years ago

California is moving toward food assistance for all populations—including undocumented immigrants

Undocumented immigrants experience food insecurity at much higher rates than other populations, yet they are…

3 years ago

Babka, borscht … and pumpkin spice? Two writers talk about Jewish identity through contemporary cookbooks.

Writer Charlotte Druckman and editor Rebecca Flint Marx are both Jewish journalists living in New…

3 years ago