Categories: Business

A tomato grows in Texas

I say tomato, you say is the future of food under threat?! After a week that, no matter the color of your state or the tenor of your conversations, likely prompted a very deep think about our political system, it can feel rather freeing to ponder a governing system of another sort—specifically, horticultural.

That’s in part because “existential” theorizing can be undertaken in two ways (hint: one of these is less fraught): the way that involves lots of ifs and it’s possibles, and the way that involves matters of life and death much closer to the ground, unfolding in the here and now, rather than in some future fog.

On the surface it’s a pretty straightforward new food economy story.[/quote1[]

By that I mean tomatoes. I’ll limit my use of metaphor, though methinks we could use a couple right about now. Case study: High tunnel tomatoes go to market. On the surface it’s a pretty straightforward new food economy story. A project funded by the Texas State Department of Agriculture and conducted through the Texas A&M AgriLife extension yielded 1,500 pounds of tomatoes grown in four high tunnels (also known as hoop houses, they’re the canned ham-shaped structures popular with urban growers), and delivered them to United Market in Amarillo. According to Dr. Charlie Rush, who led the project, United was “…thrilled to get them.”

Related Post

Another locally-grown-produce-delivered-to-the-hungry-public piece of positivity? Well, maybe. There’s a lot of that grown in the alt food system. But here’s why I like this story: 1.) It’s about food, 2.) They failed. Several times. First it was rabbits. Then it was a high incidence of tomato spotted wilt. Next, extreme heat; death to seedlings. “The trial provided learning opportunities,” Rush said. Simply.

They replanted the entire study. They planted a replica study in a field adjacent. They harvested, picked weekly, and divided the fruit into marketable and unmarketable categories. And they found that the plants growing in the protected areas yielded about 25 percent more fruit than those growing outside.

They adjusted the parts of the system under their control—water levels and electricity, tunnel design—and they surrendered to systems outside the tunnel. Because that’s what was required to complete the study. They waited and watched. Fruit grew and they fed people. There will always be that work to do. And those stories, however small and seemingly insignificant, will always need to be told.

Kate Cox
Share
Published by
Kate Cox
Tags: texas

Recent Posts

Grist acquires The Counter and launches food and agriculture vertical

Grist, an award-winning, nonprofit media organization dedicated to highlighting climate solutions and uncovering environmental injustices,…

6 months ago

Is California giving its methane digesters too much credit?

Every year, California dairy farms emit hundreds of thousands of tons of the potent greenhouse…

3 years ago

Your car is killing coho salmon

Highway 7 runs north-south through western Washington, carving its way through a landscape sparsely dotted…

3 years ago

The pandemic has transformed America’s dining landscape into an oligopoly dominated by chains 

One of the greatest pleasures I had as a child growing up in the Chicago…

3 years ago

California is moving toward food assistance for all populations—including undocumented immigrants

Undocumented immigrants experience food insecurity at much higher rates than other populations, yet they are…

3 years ago

Babka, borscht … and pumpkin spice? Two writers talk about Jewish identity through contemporary cookbooks.

Writer Charlotte Druckman and editor Rebecca Flint Marx are both Jewish journalists living in New…

3 years ago